The great enigma of human life is not suffering but affliction.
--Simone Weil
The thing is, pitch meetings are just a bone that the editors throw out to the Newbies at these conventions. They dont take them seriously. No editor is going to leave here after their pitch meetings with a book they intend to do anything with. The only do the meetings as a favor to the convention organizers.
Me, Im standing about six feet away from the person who is uttering these words to a captive audience (during a private party held during the 13th Annual World Horror Convention in Kansas City), and its taking all of my considerable powers of social restraint to not lunge across the room and feed this person the first twenty-four inches of my right leg. What theyre saying is bad enough; whats worse, everyone surrounding them is nodding in agreement as if theyre for the first time hearing Gandhi utter Genuine Wisdom; and whats even more terrible is that one of the people whos sitting near me is a fellow writer who, after weeks of hard, intensely-focused work, proposal re-writes, and hours upon hours of rehearsals with Yours Truly, has just had the kind of pitch meeting writers
dream about: not only was the editor bowled over by his pitch, not only did the editor tell him outright that his novel was
just the type of book were looking for, but said editor told him to send the entire manuscript
as soon as possible.
Now, this fellow writer had been a bit down before the convention, having just gotten another rejection in a seemingly endless string of no-thank-yous that were mercilessly chipping away at his confidence. Weve all been there, so I neednt detail the specifics; suffice to say that these pitch meetings at the con were as close to a do-or-die situation for him as any of us would ever care to get. Until this moment, hed been riding high on his pitch meeting success, but as the The Mouth (Speaker implies that they had something worthwhile to say and, trust me, they didnt) continued pontificating, I watched my fellow writer slowly begin to deflate and sink back down into the pit of depression that had all but stymied him during the weeks prior to the convention.
Im going to pause at this point in the narrative for two things: to introduce myself, and to offer the Moral Of This Story, albeit a bit early, but I think you good folks deserve to know what youre getting into, and with whom.
The names Gary A. Braunbeck. Ive eked out what I euphemistically refer to as my living writing fiction for the last sixteen years. Ive published somewhere in the neighborhood of two hundred short stories, five novels, half a dozen collections, a handful of not-bad poetry, dozens of film columns and book reviews, and have seen my work nominated for some lovely awards and translated into five languages. Im forty-three (or I will be by the time this sees print), divorced, on anti-depressants, and am on my third attempt in as many months to quit smoking. I like to watch movies, listen to music, read everything I can lay hands on
and write stories.
God, how I love to write stories. I have no hobbies of which to speak because a full 85% of my time is spent on work, making me one of the most single-minded, hyper-focused, evangelically monomaniacal little writin pricks youd never want to meet. I have a terrific agent by the name of Richard Curtis, more grey hair than Id like, twenty pounds I need to lose, and a cat named Monte who will eat anything that doesnt run away from him in time. A lot of my work has been classified as horror, and Im good with that, because I think horror fiction is or, rather,
can be a noble field in which to toil. But its got problems-admittedly, not as many as it did back in Eighties, but problems nonetheless. I am going to use this column as a platform to point out what are, in my opinion (this
is an opinion column, after all) some of the dilemmas still facing the field as we begin a new but you-bet-your-ass-
cautious resurgence of the you-should-pardon-the-word genre.
Dont point fingers and accuse me of being elitist, biased, unpleasant, acerbic, grim, arrogant, depressing, untoward, discourteous, and generally no fun at parties; I already
know Im all of these, thanks so much. And youd better damn well not accuse me of being part of the problems which I intend to discuss here; horror fiction existed long before I first put pen to paper, as did its problems, so if anything said herein and onward strikes a nerve with you, dont try to put the blame on me, folks: it was already broke when I got here.
That out of the way, Im going to offer up the moral of this first column before getting back to the fun and frolic of The Mouth.
Ready? Here it comes:
Nobodys Poop Smells Like Perfume. Yours and mine included.
Well move back into the room now, but not yet all the way back to The Mouth. Well stop for a moment and examine the irritated-looking fellow whos leaning against the oversized
faux-wood entertainment center, if you dont mind.
Let me tell you something about his current state of mind and health before he arrived at this less-than-stirring floor show.
Since last years World Horror Convention in Chicago, he has buried his father, his grandmother, and his mother; he has recently moved to a new city; he has gone through an emotionally devastating divorce; he has undergone a fairly serious surgery to repair nerve damage in his right hand; and he has had a suicidal meltdown that landed him in The Bin for a while where they kept him doped to the gills and under constant observation.
In short, he aint exactly had what youd call a banner year. He needed this convention to be a good one, not only personally, but professionally. And until The Mouth began talking, it has, indeed, been a very good convention for him. Hes met up with old friends hes not seen for a while, made several new ones, gave a dynamite reading to a nearly-packed house, been invited into several anthologies, asked if hed be interested in publishing some novellas, and has made, during an informal meeting, potentially the most important publishing deal of his life.
And now here he is, trying to decide if twenty-four inches of his right leg would fit down The Mouths throat, because the more The Mouth goes on (and on, and on, and on
) his fellow writer, the same writer whos had that dream pitch meeting, is getting way too quiet as his shoulders slump and his fists clench and a
Jesus-Have-I-Been-Kidding-Myself-And-Its-All-Been-For-Nothing? gleam covers his bespectacled eyes.
Enough of this pretentious Third Person nonsense. Apologies all around.
I was half expecting my fellow writer-lets call him Harris-to do one of two things: weep or start screaming.
Thankfully, he did neither (and take it from me, when Harris goes quiet for too long, its duck-and-cover time).
As Harris sits there looking more and more humiliated, his wife is gently rubbing his back and looking at me with an expression on her face equal parts heartbreak and fury.
And still, The Mouth continues:
Most of these Newbies dont have the slightest idea how to do a pitch, anyway; its a waste of the editors time to listen to them. You know what we should do next year? We should offer something like pitch workshops to the Newbies. Get some writers who are willing to listen to the pitches and give the Newbies advice on how to make them better. We could charge fifty dollars a head for the workshops-or more, depending on how much work the Newbies need.
To which the audience once again nodded their heads; some quite vigorously.
I am now inwardly sorrowing.
Its time to tell you something about The Mouth. Youve probably heard of them; have, in fact, probably read some of their stories and books, as I have. The Mouth is a solid writer, no question about that. The Mouths work has been nominated for some lovely awards, which it deserves to be. But The Mouth suffers from an affliction that claims far too many writers early on in their careers, an affliction whose causes and effects are as follows:
- Writer makes first pro sale; ego and confidence are boosted.
- Writer makes second, then third, then fourth pro sales and so on; ego and confidence are further boosted.
- Writer then goes on to make first book sale; boost to ego and confidence from earlier successes cube themselves.
- Writers book receives good reviews and is perhaps nominated for an award or two; the ego/confidence factor is now being muscled aside by a bourgeoning arrogance caused by a swelling of the cranium.
- Writer then attends conventions where readers of their stories and books clamor to tell them how wonderful their work is and by the way, would the writer mind autographing their book, it would mean so much; and here, dear friends, is where the affliction really takes hold: the writer is suddenly faced, possibly for the first time, with tangible evidence that people are not only paying for their stuff, but reading it, as well.
Whoda thunk it?
And thus affliction becomes disease, because the writer (and Im talking about a very specific kind of writer here, more on that in a moment) not only begins to
listen to the wonderful things the readers say to them, they begin to
believe what theyre hearing.
Its a rare bird who can hear dozens (if not hundreds) of people tell them, Oh, God, your work is so wonderful! Youre such a great writer! over and over and
not get a little cocky; but most writers learn to accept readers praise gracefully and gratefully, all the while knowing that (as Stephen King said), It is the tale; not he who tells it.
But theres a specific kind of writer for whom that last seems to never really fully register.
Im talking about that nightmare of nightmares: The Big Success in the Small Press.
Dont get your bowels in an uproar (as both my mom and dad used to say); I am not hyphen, italicize for emphasis
not thumbing my nose at the Small Press; I am not saying that the Small Press isnt very much worthwhile; I am not implying that Small Press publishers are a bunch of tunnel-visioned little dweebs who publish their dweeb buddies work for their dweeb buddies dweeb friends to dweeb all over at some Annual Dweeb Jamboree. I myself have seen more than a little success thanks to the Small Press and will be the first to tell you that a majority of the SP publishers out there are stand-up folks who do what they do out of love and respect for the field and pride themselves on publishing professional-level books.
Have we all got that? I am not castigating the Small Press.
I
am, however, decrying a by-product
of the Small Press. Think of the Small Press as being (for the purposes of this argument) cast in the role of Victor Frankenstein, trying to create something wondrous and new for the world, but at some point along the line Something (insert ominous chord here) Goes Terribly Wrong Through No Fault Of Theirs, and a monster is unleashed.
The Big Success in the Small Press suddenly begins thinking they know something the rest of us dont, that the
very limited demographic of readers theyve met at conventions somehow represent the vast majority of the reading public (who, they seem to believe, is just
rioting to read their work), and because of such grand delusions (which these writers have done nothing to rid themselves of), they now think theyve earned the right to patronize, humiliate, belittle, demean, and mock fellow writers who, unlike their own aggrandized selves, are only starting out.
And they do this with one itty-bitty word; one that I heard enough during that convention to last me several lifetimes; one that is snarled in much the same way most people would snarl child molester, rapist, or congressional representative.
The word?
Newbie.
Never have I heard a word spoken with such obvious disgust, condescension, and repugnance as it was spoken during this convention, and this private party, specifically.
I couldnt help but wonder how The Mouth would feel if they knew there were at least three Newbies in that room. Maybe thats why The Mouth felt compelled to deliver the sermon at just over five hundred decibels-to make sure the up-and-coming competition in the room knew to stay in their place and let The Real Writers show em what its all really about.
This kind of egotistical, self-important, narrow-minded, and exclusionary mentality in the horror field is, quite simply, beneath contempt.
Period.
Consider, if you will, some of the brouhaha that erupted a few years back with the HWA. The younger and less seasoned members of the organization accused the older and much more savvy members (who were then in power) of having lost touch with the plight of their fellow writers who werent Names and werent getting the big advances and shelf space at the neighborhood Walpurgis-Mart, blah-blah-blah, boo-hoo, and so on. It would have been downright silly if it hadnt gotten so uckfeying ugly. As a result of this vicious in-fighting, a lot of name professionals left the organization and not many of them have returned. (Parenthetical pause here: Things with HWA have gotten a lot better since then-yeah, theres still a handful of whiners who seem constitutionally required to piss and moan about every little thing that comes down the line but, overall, its well on its way to regaining its stature as a serious and professional organization; so much so that I, after a four-year hiatus, recently rejoined.)
I cite this example to illustrate the undeniably hurtful and potentially long-term damage holier-than-thou attitudes like those bellowed by The Mouth can have if we dont stop every so often to put our egos in check.
Nobodys poop smells like perfume. Anyone who thinks theyre hot snot on a silver platter is more often than not just a cold booger on a paper plate. (Got that from a fortune cookie. Seriously.)
By now, Im guessing someone who was there that night has figured out who Im talking about, and has undoubtedly alerted The Mouth to the contents of this inaugural column.
Hoop-dee-doo-da-diddle.
So Im going to say the following in print to The Mouth and others like them (I have met others of The Mouths ilk too many times over the years) because I failed to fully speak my mind at the time:
How. Bloody.
Dare. You.
How
dare you think that because youve seen some measure of success in the Small Press that youve the right to look down your nose in disdain at fellow writers who are just learning the ropes. Do you have
any idea how insulting you were (and probably still are)? Do you even care that while you were pontificating and those cowardly, sick-making, kiss-ass minions surrounding you were nodding their heads in blank-stared agreement, you nearly pushed not one, not two, but
three Newbie writers over that edge of defeat and despair that has swallowed far too many of us over the years? If that metaphor is a little too complicated for you, then Ill put it like this: Because of your insipid, arrogant, ill-informed homily, I personally had to spend the remainder of the convention convincing not one, not two, but
three Newbie writers that all their work and sweat and anxiety was
not for nothing.
My guess is you didnt care then, and dont give much of a tinkers damn about it now; hell, you probably dont even understand why Im upset.
Pathetic.
And while Im at it, lets have a few words for all of those who sat there and not only nodded their heads in agreement, but actually started offering
suggestions on how to run these pitch workshops so as to get the most money out of them for the least amount of time and effort:
You made me momentarily ashamed to be a part of the horror community, and since that community is more or less the core of my existence, you also made me momentarily regret that I didnt finish what I started mid-meltdown; you can only miss so many appointments in Sumarra before they stop taking your calls.
Keep in mind, folks, that The Mouth is not
that uncommon a case, be they published in the Small Press or otherwise.
That beliefs like this still exist that we who have seen publication are somehow more gifted, wiser, more deserving of respect and awe, and in general
better than those fellow writers who are just starting to learn and/or ply their craft-is an insult to all writers at any stage of their career, and should be ground under ones heel into dust at every chance.
Of course those of us whove seen publication have picked up some knowledge that newer writers might lack;
of course those of us with proven track records have been privy to some of the inner-working of the publishing business that newer writers, odds are, dont even know exist; and you betcher bonanga-loo-loos that those of us who are through the good taste, faith, and support of editors, publishers, and readers-enjoying a certain level of success
revel in it, maybe even from time to time feel proud of ourselves for having continued to make it (whatever that means); wed be morons to
not dig it and be grateful.
But does any of that make us
superior to newer writers? Does it somehow mean that we are to be coddled to and the newer writers ignored, scoffed at, and looked down upon simply
because theyre new?
Do I really have to answer either of those?
I am not calling for a Socialist playing field here; as Tom Monteleone has pointed out many times, the playing field isnt level, nor should it be; there is, however, a standard for better with which I fully agree.
So what is it, exactly, that we should use to gauge whether or not one writer is better than another? The amount of their advances? How many books the have on sale in the dealers room at whichever convention? Whether or not theyve ever been quoted in
Locus or
Writers Digest? Maybe the amount of lovely awards theyve received? Name recognition? How many autographs they sign over the course of a given year? How many slack-jawed minions they can hold court over at private parties?
Huh-uh.
The only gauge of one writers value over another to which anyone should give credence, the sole measure of worth that ever counted or ever
will count, the single most credible proof of the pudding was, is, and always shall be this:
The work.
That is the
only measure of significance that should ever be taken into consideration; the rest of it is just hot air and attempts to make the writer feel/look/seem to be more important than that which they write.
And that just aint so, folks; never was, never will be.
For the record, I know writers who have published easily three or four times the amount of stuff I have whose work cant hold a candle to my own; I also know writers who have yet to publish, or who have published only a small handful of stories, and their stuff is better now than my work can ever hope to be. But the one thing all of these writers have in common, the thing which makes me continue to respect them as both people and professionals, is that all of them know, deep in their burning cores, that those eloquent words penned by Stephen King may be among the truest and most noble ever written; it is, indeed, the tale; not he who tells it.
Wed all do well to remember that the next someone like The Mouth decides that the aroma of their waste seduces the olfactory senses with the subtle fragrance of exotic flora.
Further, deponeth sayeth not.
#
I have decided that Im going to end each column by offering up a couple of suggestions; the first, lets file under Writing Suggestions; the second will be a book and/or story that I think any serious horror reader should add to their TBR list.
This time, the writing suggestion is going to deal with a culprit who has become, methinks, the horror writers deadliest enemy: I speak of the exclamation point.
To whit: The exclamation point belongs in dialogue and only in dialogue; on this I will hear no argument.
Whenever I encounter an exclamation point used outside of dialogue, I am suddenly pulled from the spell of the story (assuming that it was cast in the first place) and made painfully aware of the writers intent. Its the writer telling me, the reader, that this! Is! Supposed! To! Be! Exciting! Or! Shocking! Or! Revelatory! It automatically tells me that the writer doesnt trust my intelligence and instincts as a reader enough to let me figure out for myself that something is supposed to shock or stun or scare me.
Consider the following examples, all of them lifted from recent horror stories Ive read: The quotation marks are mine; these lines did not come from sections of dialogue:
He realized that he
hadnt locked the door behind him! (Italics will be a subject we cover in another column.)
And now they were going to kill her!
They werent alone in the house!
You couldnt believe how loud your wife screamed when you opened your eyes!
He was lost!
You get the idea. To say its melodramatic would be to succumb to gross understatement. The use of the exclamation point outside of dialogue is, to my mind, a lazy cop-out all too frequently embraced by horror writers (and weve all done it, myself included). Think Im overstating my point? Then try this simple exercise: Pick any of the above-quoted lines, and when you reach the exclamation point, imagine that it is the first four notes of the
Dragnet theme. Go ahead, Ill wait.
Makes its use seem absurd, doesnt it?
They werent alone in the house-
Dum-Da-Dum-Dum.
Or, more appropriately, Dumb-Da-Dumb-Dumb.
Amen to that.
#
Early in 2003, Night Shade Books released a stellar collection of fiction and essays from the superb (and now deceased,
goddammit!) Jack Cady that any serious reader of horror should have on their shelves.
Ghosts of Yesterday is the best single-author collection Ive read in five years, and contains one of the best short stories Ive ever read in any genre, The Lady With The Blind Dog. The story-like the collection itself-is by turns thoughtful, sad, frightening, tragic, and, in the end, majestically chilling. Youd also do well to pay close attention to the essay On Writing The Ghost Story and the novella The Time That Time Forgot. Cady knows how to do it right, and makes the work produced by most of us look like high-school level attempts at Lit-rah-chure. Get it and read it. Do it now. The mans memory deserves nothing less from us.
#
If youve any comments youd care to send my way, you can reach me via e-mail at
gbraunbeck(at)insight.rr.com, or my snail address: P.O. Box 26991, Columbus, OH 43226-0991.
Stay tuned
.
posted 9:26 AM